Maternal Instincts of the Business World
“Children must be taught how to think, not what to
think.” ― Margaret Mead
Reading this quote made me wonder; did my mother follow
this? On further introspection, I realized that she did; she never forced me to
do anything, she just introduced me to ideas. For instance, reading. It started
with reading me bedtime stories to encouraging me to read the newspaper out
loud, then following it up with getting me children’s books when she realized
that I enjoyed reading. She never forced upon me any hobby or interest, she
introduced me to new activities, observed whether I developed any interest for
them and when she saw that interest, she encouraged me to explore it further.
Today, when I read books, write articles, speak at public
events, I may not openly acknowledge it, but it is because of that foundation
which she laid for me, that I have been able to build my entire skill set. If
we look at parallels for this in the business world, then I would say this is
what one means by mentorship - a maternal approach to refine the next
generation.
Just like a mother, a mentor needs to understand the
protégés pros & cons, observe their inclinations and guide them to build on
their positive attributes and work on mitigating the effect of those attributes
which are holding him/her back from growing, and in turn, help his/her success
journey.
It is a wrong belief that only a select few can be protégés.
It is however, true that a select few understand and cope with the mentor’s
guidance. That’s why, we see only few successful mentor-protégé relationships.
As a leader, I look at myself as a mentor to all who are junior to me. It is
then up to the juniors, whether they want to continue being my protégés or not.
A leader leads by example, but a mentor leads by aligning
the examples as per the protégé’s - needs. The objective of mentorship is not
to create your own replica but use your experience to help the protégé become a
better and a more successful version of himself/herself. Spoon-feeding never
works in mentorship; the mentor is the guide, but the efforts and the
intelligence has to be that of the protégé.
Considering my deep interest in Hindu mythology, I would
give the example of Lord Krishna & Arjun on the Kurukshetra battlefield. Lord
Krishna being the charioteer made sure that he guided Arjun to be present at
the right place at the right time, be a silent force helping & guiding him
behind the scenes. In the end, all the hard work was that of Arjun. Lord Krishna
was the ideal mentor, a man with skills to finish things on his own. However, he
chose to take a backseat, giving an opportunity to his protégé to use his
skills and shine in the battlefield.
Mentors also need to realize theirs as well as their
protégé’s limitations. Not every protégé has the same skills or intelligence. It
is thus the job of the mentor to assess the extent to which a person can
improve and guide them to that point. To develop the protégé into the best
version of himself, is what the mentor can do. A mentor is not expected to
create a new person all together.
One of the most important flaws in mentors also runs
parallel to mothers; not letting go of their babies. As they know that
they have a key role in creating this person, it is difficult to let go of that
person when he/she wishes to leave the nest. But mentors must realize that it
was their duty to guide the protégés till the point from where they can take
off on their own and fight their own battles, probably go on to be mentors to
others. Stopping them is wasting all the effort spent in mentoring them. So,
“Let Go”.
And, as they say “A ship in harbor is
safe — but that is not what ships are built for”
P.S. – This article is dedicated to all my mentors notably
My Father, Mr. Vaibhav Patkar, Mr. Suresh Dadlani, Mr. Kishor Vaswani, Mr.
Satya Rane and most importantly my MOTHER, who though not with me in flesh
today, will live on through all my successes and victories.
No comments:
Post a Comment